) & it will include 2 figures 
..amazing...
Wayne, Per Olav has been doing this project about 3 years ago, he had to stop due to other commitments he had. When doing KO models rest assured no one choose a 'bad' kit or because a work went bad so do it crashed down, when doing a KO one has a bigger challenge and has to plan things much more ... it is not something you do because you have missing parts or a model turned bad ... it is a complex projects and people with guts manage to make it right ... you have to built a broken damaged model, the broken and weathered parts have to be planned well, you need to make the material look proper, colours etc etc ... it is no easy task!Wayne wrote:I think that we (the aircraft section) should really start thinking out of the box in our projects. This is just in a league of its own.
I know that most would be reluctant to take a kit bought with hard earned cash and turn it into an artistic pile of scrap, but we have to face the fact that:
- accidents do happen
- aircraft get neglected if they outlive their usefulness
- eventually every bird get's it (even if eventually restored and placed in a museum)
Furthermore, I think we all have kits that have outlived their usefulness due to inaccuracies, missing parts, failed/abandoned projects etc that could be turned into an artistic scene.
There are lots of reference pics showing aircraft in a painfully sorry state, but I think we just choose to ignore them.
Robert tried this with a scene of an aircraft underwater and I think it turned out pretty well, so Kudos to him.
BRAVISSIMU Wayne for your POSITIVE THINKING & MAYBE You INSTIGATE the STUBBORN HEADS of our SSM Wing Nuts (something I've been trying to do for a while now by "silently" post pics of this sort like that heavily weathered Zero) in venturing out of the boxiCocker wrote:Wayne, Per Olav has been doing this project about 3 years ago, he had to stop due to other commitments he had. When doing KO models rest assured no one choose a 'bad' kit or because a work went bad so do it crashed down, when doing a KO one has a bigger challenge and has to plan things much more ... it is not something you do because you have missing parts or a model turned bad ... it is a complex projects and people with guts manage to make it right ... you have to built a broken damaged model, the broken and weathered parts have to be planned well, you need to make the material look proper, colours etc etc ... it is no easy task!Wayne wrote:I think that we (the aircraft section) should really start thinking out of the box in our projects. This is just in a league of its own.
I know that most would be reluctant to take a kit bought with hard earned cash and turn it into an artistic pile of scrap, but we have to face the fact that:
- accidents do happen
- aircraft get neglected if they outlive their usefulness
- eventually every bird get's it (even if eventually restored and placed in a museum)
Furthermore, I think we all have kits that have outlived their usefulness due to inaccuracies, missing parts, failed/abandoned projects etc that could be turned into an artistic scene.
There are lots of reference pics showing aircraft in a painfully sorry state, but I think we just choose to ignore them.
Robert tried this with a scene of an aircraft underwater and I think it turned out pretty well, so Kudos to him.
iCocker wrote:Wayne, Per Olav has been doing this project about 3 years ago, he had to stop due to other commitments he had. When doing KO models rest assured no one choose a 'bad' kit or because a work went bad so do it crashed down, when doing a KO one has a bigger challenge and has to plan things much more ... it is not something you do because you have missing parts or a model turned bad ... it is a complex projects and people with guts manage to make it right ... you have to built a broken damaged model, the broken and weathered parts have to be planned well, you need to make the material look proper, colours etc etc ... it is no easy task!Wayne wrote:I think that we (the aircraft section) should really start thinking out of the box in our projects. This is just in a league of its own.
I know that most would be reluctant to take a kit bought with hard earned cash and turn it into an artistic pile of scrap, but we have to face the fact that:
- accidents do happen
- aircraft get neglected if they outlive their usefulness
- eventually every bird get's it (even if eventually restored and placed in a museum)
Furthermore, I think we all have kits that have outlived their usefulness due to inaccuracies, missing parts, failed/abandoned projects etc that could be turned into an artistic scene.
There are lots of reference pics showing aircraft in a painfully sorry state, but I think we just choose to ignore them.
Robert tried this with a scene of an aircraft underwater and I think it turned out pretty well, so Kudos to him.
the kit isn't exactly brand spanking new but it's definitely suitable. I AGREE 101% especially the word IDOLISEiCocker wrote:There is always the first try, to be honest Per Olav is a tank guy so like me we enjoy to see downed birds, but not always it is wise to use old kits, in our project we used the old for trial only and realised it is better using the new as detail is much better etc ... but again depends the project, hux ... the old can be punishing compared to the modern age models but I agree wing nuts are a bit rigid and afraid to sacrifice a bird to such an extend, you idolise too much ... you have to let go and make such a model, still it is atractive if not more!
TIME FOR CHANGE
.....that is IDOLISE ....and it is ALL coming from "HIM" the ONE & ONLY 
IS UPON US Min fejn gibta din min xi ktieb ta Esopu? Dan modeller bhali u bhalekk bid-diferenza li mohhu ma jahlihx quddiem FB jew TV bhal hafna [inkluz jien] u meta jkollu idea krejativa jaf jimplimenta u jesperimenta ... nasigurak naf x'qed nghid ghax nafu sew li dan il-bniedem, per ezempju l-biza tieghu hi u jaf li hi problema ghalih, ibghati jisboh figura sew, temminha imma vera, kulhadd l-istess hallik mit-top brass ... jekk trid titghallem it-tijorija tal-kuluri jekk tixtri l-colour wheel min ghand artshop ghandek bidu ... hafna differenti milli tixtri miljun ktieb fuq ic-chips tal-109 ... my 2 Euros on this Buddyskyhigh wrote:Mind you ta all this fuss ............ these modelers or artist called them what you want,, are artist they studied ART..or what so ever..they studied colors , pigment etc... .... So they have a good backround of what is color and so on ,, they are brave talented .. but you can't compare a modeler who ones bought a model , or receive a birthday present and start building models ... even if you practice , you never gain the same result...........
Just my 2c.... enjoy building models..... leave the compt to the top brass.........
what about traitors, what shall we do!Ray wrote:I AGREE 101% especially the word IDOLISEiCocker wrote:There is always the first try, to be honest Per Olav is a tank guy so like me we enjoy to see downed birds, but not always it is wise to use old kits, in our project we used the old for trial only and realised it is better using the new as detail is much better etc ... but again depends the project, hux ... the old can be punishing compared to the modern age models but I agree wing nuts are a bit rigid and afraid to sacrifice a bird to such an extend, you idolise too much ... you have to let go and make such a model, still it is atractive if not more!
TIME FOR CHANGE
They (Wing Nuts) ALL DO
The time for some BEHEADINGS
You may be right JF, but I wanted to "INSTIGATE" some awareness in You Wing Nuts that planes need not NECESSARY be IDOLISEDJ.Fenech wrote:Amazing work is being done here, but I am afraid that you posted the article under the wrong section - it should have been posted in the diorama section.
Secondly, what is making it stand out is not the just the airplane but the dramatic composition of the entire set.
You mean TRAITORS WHO TURNED PHOTOGRAPHERS I HopeJ.Fenech wrote:what about traitors, what shall we do!Ray wrote:I AGREE 101% especially the word IDOLISEiCocker wrote:There is always the first try, to be honest Per Olav is a tank guy so like me we enjoy to see downed birds, but not always it is wise to use old kits, in our project we used the old for trial only and realised it is better using the new as detail is much better etc ... but again depends the project, hux ... the old can be punishing compared to the modern age models but I agree wing nuts are a bit rigid and afraid to sacrifice a bird to such an extend, you idolise too much ... you have to let go and make such a model, still it is atractive if not more!
TIME FOR CHANGE
They (Wing Nuts) ALL DO
The time for some BEHEADINGS
U mur saqqi l-hass tal-Marsa FOTOGRAFU TRADITUR KOLLOKskyhigh wrote:No Ray, he is refering for those.. who one's they are with you..and at the end of the day they turn agains't you...
...I'm still on the wings side ..and that I will gone be till the last breath........
Ippruvajt infittex biex insib ic-chips li semmejt li semma Ivan u ma sibtha mkienskyhigh wrote:Ivan ma nafx xandu xjaqsam il 109 fija din..... chips u xnaf semmejt , pero najdlek inutli li tisboh sabih u tigbed l gfhajn tal jugdes biex tiehu xi midalja ..jekk is suggett ma jkunx auhtentiku u xebgha zbalji jew fil version ..bla sugu .. u nafx xjien najd ghax xbajd nara mudelli b hafna zbalji ..laqwa li mizbuh li jigbed l ghajn.............. u iz zebgha taghna ukoll.........
AmeniCocker wrote:Serrah mohhok bniedem bhal Per Olav m'ghandux bzonn jigbed l-ghajn tal-judges, dan bniedem krejativ hafna li johlom jaghmel ... hemm differenza, dan ma jibniex ghal midalji, din l-istorja xbajtu isemmghu u qed taqu fin-nasba tal-marketing ta' min jeqred u jinteresah affarijiet ohra LOL ... nahseb qed tidhol wisq f'kompetizjoni tal-fotografija dawn l-affarijiet hemm isiru LOL
|
|
|
Home