iCocker Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:22 am
The impact is there though the images are duff my friend ... Storm girl, you have a child who lost her innocence surrounded by what was once her playingground and home, now all debri, solitude and the remains of a burnt out tricycle, she is worst then death as she survived ... survived the aftermath of the worst weapon developed by men ... I think it is simple enough, you have to look outside the box when dealing with such vignettes ... and let the viewer come up with his own philosophy ... the other one is also very strong, an inmate collecting the belongings of the poor guys who were sent to the gas chambers ... he could have easily made a queue of people going to the chambers or a pile of death bodies BUT he created something different, the solitude and emptiness give the message of death ... this is another way in both subjects to deal with horrors, this time instead of direct impact it makes you think ... that was my debate.
It is like movies for example Tarrantino, he loves red blood baths to give his impact of death, then we have Spielberg and Cameron who create impact different, like a red sea and puddles, death fish and death cows [showing that war does not choose anything and men also destroys the peace of nature] besides death men, frightened soldiers ... like the soldier searching his blown hand, he kept the colours dull though all death and soldiers are full of grime and blood ... all directors are good yet all have a different kind of impact ... not one is better then the other ...
Ivan