Butterfly Princess 80mm

just be careful not to alter too much the center of gravity, otherwise the flying characteristics would go flying out of the window

bcauchi wrote:At first i was against this Ray but now i see that it is looking good. You were right and i put forward my humble apologies. However, i think you have to watch out for the angle at which the fairy will be standing or rather flying to see how they have to be postitioned unless they are really silicone bags!

Good point Brian, however I can assure you that she's an all natural CC cup in her PRIME and the sag per se would only be as you pointed out, re her angle at which she's sucking the pollen

RayCaruana wrote:Any pictures to help him Marco?

Marco needs pictures ???????

J.Fenech wrote:just be careful not to alter too much the center of gravity, otherwise the flying characteristics would go flying out of the window

Yes sure JF but remember that she's temporarily standing in these pics ( I should have positioned her accordingly I know) and that might appear misleading

The bigger you make them the more important is the angle at which she is flying. If you notice the first few photos you posted where there is the entire set up, her body is very close to the horizontal. She only has a slight angle upwards.

I think that we will have to censor this thread or else 'blur' the private parts

Kullhadd dejjaq ukoll

...and how technical we're getting!!! Centre of gravity u x'naf jien

Ok this is a more appropriate angle to scrutinize from as it is more or less how she would rest on the water lilly leaf

I know that I don't have to REMIND YOU but there's no harm in repeating it.......ANY COMMENTS ARE WELCOME PLEASE "technical" or not I JUST LOVE IT

Ray, joking apart. For a breast of that weight, the right should hang down towards the left, even if silicone implanted. aND DEFINETLY won't show from the back. It is a different scenario from the small cupped breasts she had before surgery. The sculptor there, did a great job IMO.

Too large and too spherical for NATURAL breasts...OK theyre 'Work In Progress' but I think that if you opted to augment her breasts you should have gone for a more modest augmentation..

My personal opinion...bit overdone mate...hope you prove my wrong when you finish them...

Dottore

RayCaruana wrote:...and how technical we're getting!!! Centre of gravity u x'naf jien

Xintom professional... khemm tifmu prosit Raggae u brian I'm impressed

bcauchi wrote:The bigger you make them the more important is the angle at which she is flying. If you notice the first few photos you posted where there is the entire set up, her body is very close to the horizontal. She only has a slight angle upwards.

I agree, but the bigger they get the less the chance she will ever fly.

p.s. - you may need a RATO(rocket assisted take off) pack so that a liftoff can be achieved. These are WWII german, just that you get the idea, you can do them as a backpack http://www.hyperscale.com/2009/reviews/accessories/mdccv32043reviewbg_1.htm

Ray wrote:

RayCaruana wrote:Any pictures to help him Marco?

Marco needs pictures ???????

Do you think this help, she got Blue wings...

You just got to LOVE SSM, wether you like it or not

We are the EXPERTS on ALL FRONTS

Mind you, I HAD NO DOUBTS that I would FIND all the ASSISTANCE I would be needing

This thread is really getting interesting! I agree with the others, for natural breasts, they should be hanging little differently for her stance.

At least it's a good excuse to be searching the Internet for different ladies sites, research isn't easy, but somebody has to do it!

I have been trying to sound very technical but this is bordering on the naughty now. Well, a change from the usual is really welcome, especially a nice change like this. A perfectly valid excuse to discuss the female form!! But Joe might be right, she is going to need a longer takeoff run to get her airborne. Might need an extension to the surface area of her wings. Probably that's why the sculptor gave her smallish ones.

[quote="bcauchi"]I have been trying to sound very technical but this is bordering on the naughty now.


But Brian this is art !!!!

Ray

PM sent

RayCaruana wrote:Ray

PM sent

Yes read it mate and I answered you.......BTW very mature thinking re sending me that pic (which is harmless as is Marco's) via a PM, as I would have preferred to keep MY THREAD "clean" of any "pretended artist" picture posting abilities on our forum and again on MY THREAD

I am very impressed how many experts we have on female anatomy!

Actually there are many experts on any subject under the sun but he asked for this. That operation called for a comment..... But in the end the expert advice will pay off and he will have a great looking fairy I'm sure.

he he he, now need to pay maximum atention on details. i see so far conversion of this figure going in let say positive direction. look just adorable , even like this.
cant wait to see it finished.

ALL the EXPERTS said YES

However I really MISSED the REAL EXPERT......Doc Roe's BIOLOGICAL/ANATOMICAL VIEW

Of all the suggestions/advice, I'm really contemplating Stephen's that is to go withouth the Notorious N

It would be nice if he can chime in and give a detailed explanation why he's at this conclusion

Ray,I saw this at the club and I have to say you're 'handling' the job quite beautifully:). But I still can't understand the phrase 'in three stages'. Why on earth do you need three stages for that?

Steve