LVG's Lt.Weymar

Noel Petroni wrote:I will take you word for it.    Oh!  don't expect everyone to read everything.

However, I still stand by my judgement...... I had your photos of the figure copied on a 14GB USB and I made several hard copies of them. I had some of them enlarged, especially the one showing the figure from the side which shows him well leaning backwards.

I had the photos scanned at a friend of mine who superimposed them on an computer generated grid.  The grid clearly shows that the backward lean is not a natural pose.  By placing values on the grid the computer will be able to calculate the 'true lean' and your figure showed that you are off by 5.08 impex degree which when calculated to the relative coherent true gravity it give the figure an unnatural pose.

Now, just to show that I not only comment but also give you the soluation, I went further to calculate the inert proximation of the gravitational pull from the top of the head (this being calulated and reduced ti suit 1:35 scale... which was a pain to get it correct!), to his lower lumber support. In short your figure should be moved forward just a tad. In engineering terms... .02 degrees forward and -.23 degrees to the left.

Thank me at the club  

THANK YOU HERE PUBLICILY

Ray wrote:

Noel Petroni wrote:I will take you word for it.    Oh!  don't expect everyone to read everything.

However, I still stand by my judgement...... I had your photos of the figure copied on a 14GB USB and I made several hard copies of them. I had some of them enlarged, especially the one showing the figure from the side which shows him well leaning backwards.

I had the photos scanned at a friend of mine who superimposed them on an computer generated grid.  The grid clearly shows that the backward lean is not a natural pose.  By placing values on the grid the computer will be able to calculate the 'true lean' and your figure showed that you are off by 5.08 impex degree which when calculated to the relative coherent true gravity it give the figure an unnatural pose.

Now, just to show that I not only comment but also give you the soluation, I went further to calculate the inert proximation of the gravitational pull from the top of the head (this being calulated and reduced ti suit 1:35 scale... which was a pain to get it correct!), to his lower lumber support. In short your figure should be moved forward just a tad. In engineering terms... .02 degrees forward and -.23 degrees to the left.

Thank me at the club  

THANK YOU HERE PUBLICILY

J.Fenech wrote:

Ray wrote:

Noel Petroni wrote:I will take you word for it.    Oh!  don't expect everyone to read everything.

However, I still stand by my judgement...... I had your photos of the figure copied on a 14GB USB and I made several hard copies of them. I had some of them enlarged, especially the one showing the figure from the side which shows him well leaning backwards.

I had the photos scanned at a friend of mine who superimposed them on an computer generated grid.  The grid clearly shows that the backward lean is not a natural pose.  By placing values on the grid the computer will be able to calculate the 'true lean' and your figure showed that you are off by 5.08 impex degree which when calculated to the relative coherent true gravity it give the figure an unnatural pose.

Now, just to show that I not only comment but also give you the soluation, I went further to calculate the inert proximation of the gravitational pull from the top of the head (this being calulated and reduced ti suit 1:35 scale... which was a pain to get it correct!), to his lower lumber support. In short your figure should be moved forward just a tad. In engineering terms... .02 degrees forward and -.23 degrees to the left.

Thank me at the club  

THANK YOU HERE PUBLICILY

That's complicated analysis  what about other variables such as wind, temperature, humidity, etc....

skyhigh wrote:   Noel these such Modeler's , when you bring them ..kif jajt il Malti darhom mal hajd... johorgulek b'din  'artistic license' ...    tajba din... 

bcauchi wrote:Noel, are you by any chance a Star Trek Fan?

bcauchi wrote:No he will not get mad, it will be an excuse for him to put in more posts and keep increasing his massive amount of posts.

skyhigh wrote:

bcauchi wrote:No he will not get mad, it will be an excuse for him to put in more posts and keep increasing his massive amount of posts.

   Xi pjacir........  

Noel Petroni wrote:

bcauchi wrote:Noel, are you by any chance a Star Trek Fan?

No Brian.... I like to watch Big Bang Theory!!

(Ray is going to get mad that I hijacked his thread)

bcauchi wrote:Hi is hard at work painting the figure, the next post will show us paint!  Whoopee!!!

I WISH Bri  

Waiting for the putty to harden a bit as I've just added the coat "tail" to rest on the wing  

What a bloody STRESSFULL TASK, with the LVG here & weaving myself thru THE FRIGGIN RIGGING & applying talcum powder to the bare minimum so to protect the clear varnish  

Infact I'm going for a walk in the meantime so to RELEASE the "toxic waste" in my blood system  

Won't start painting until tomorrow the least  

I'm on Leave till Tue next so would be able to finish Lt.Weymar till Wed next  

To MarKo & Noel.......throw all your MUD at me   It Will Only Make Me Stronger  

bcauchi wrote:Since he does not post anywhere i need to hijack your thread to tell Joseph prosit for the lovely work he did on the plane, it is looking magnificent in the limited view we have.  It would be great if he could post some more pics of it.